Schizophrenia or Possession? A Reply to Kemal Irmak and Nuray Karanci.
Journal of Religion and Health October 1, 2015 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-015-0027-4 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractSome cases of schizophrenia are argued to be demon possession and treatable by faith healers. A reply raises concerns about the intellectual credibility and harmful implications of such beliefs. This paper contributes by arguing that a critique of demon possession beliefs in schizophrenia is needed, but on an alternative basis. It reflects on differences between demonic and other spirit possession and considers implications for mental healthcare providers.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 51 |
| Key finding | Argues that a critique of demon possession beliefs in the context of schizophrenia is needed, but on an alternative basis, and that important differences between demonic and other forms of spirit possession have implications for mental healthcare providers. |
Abstract
A recent paper in this journal argues that some cases of schizophrenia should be seen as cases of demon possession and treated by faith healers. A reply, also published in this journal, responds by raising concerns about the intellectual credibility and potentially harmful practical implications of demon possession beliefs. My paper contributes to the discussion, arguing that a critique of demon possession beliefs in the context of schizophrenia is needed, but suggesting an alternative basis for it. It also reflects on important differences between demonic and other forms of spirit possession and considers the implications of this for mental healthcare providers.