Characteristics of adverse reactions to kratom and implementation of harm reduction strategies in a sample of ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado.
Cianna J Piercey, Joseph Cameron, Riley Ahern, Isabella Packwood, Carter Bruning, Devin Henry, Jesse Ruehrmund, Katelyn Weldon, Kirsten E Smith, Hollis C Karoly
Harm Reduction Journal March 2, 2026 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-025-01382-x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Field survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 102 |
| Population | Adults recruited from ethnobotanical tea bars in Northern Colorado |
| Keywords | Adverse effects Ethnobotanical tea bars Field survey Harm reduction Kratom Mitragyna speciosa Mixed methods |
| Key findings | 75.5% of participants reported experiencing an adverse reaction to kratom at least once, with reactions commonly linked to consumption on an empty stomach, lack of hydration, and combining kratom with other substances. |
Abstract
Kratom is a psychoactive botanical that is increasingly popular in the United States. While potential risks of kratom use have been identified, research on harm reduction strategies and contextual factors contributing to adverse reactions is limited. Given that kratom is federally unregulated at present, and a variety of kratom products are widely available on the commercial market, more data are needed to inform harm reduction efforts and public health messaging. 102 participants (mean age = 22.34 years, 39.2% women) were recruited from ethnobotanical tea bars in Northern Colorado to complete a survey on kratom use, which included questions pertaining to adverse experiences. Most participants (75.5%) reported experiencing an adverse reaction to kratom at least once in the past, with a wide range of kratom doses reportedly consumed during these experiences. Adverse reactions were most commonly reported to occur in the context of consuming kratom on an empty stomach, consuming alongside certain foods, lack of hydration, and combining kratom with other substances. Participants employed a variety of strategies in attempt to mitigate adverse reactions, such as stopping or pacing their use of kratom and other substances, modulating hydration and food intake, and engaging in rest and recovery behaviors. Adverse reactions to kratom may be associated with certain contextual factors. Several techniques are reportedly used to mitigate adverse reactions, but the efficacy of these techniques is unknown. More data are needed to understand the causes and consequences of adverse reactions to kratom, and to better understand potential harm reduction strategies for reducing adverse experiences. More research could also shed light on the extent to which kratom serving size and various product formulations (e.g. whole leaf vs. extracts) are predictive of adverse effects.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Development of the Protective Strategies for Psychedelics Scale: A novel inventory to assess safety strategies in the context of psychedelics Journal of Psychopharmacology December 4, 2023
- Protective Behavioral Strategies for Psychedelic Use: A Mini Review of the Evidence. Psychedelic Medicine December 1, 2024
- Prevalence of reagent test-kit use and perceptions of purity among ecstasy users in an electronic dance music scene in New York City. Drug and Alcohol Review January 2019
- Harm reduction strategies related to dosing and their relation to harms among festival attendees who use multiple drugs Drug and Alcohol Review October 9, 2018