Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".
Front Psychol November 15, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1058325 (opens in new tab) via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThis commentary critiques neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing, responding to Manzotti's arguments about the boundaries and location of consciousness. It examines how identity theories define consciousness, questioning their assumptions and implications. The author argues that neurocentrist approaches, which equate consciousness with brain processes, face conceptual difficulties when accounting for the phenomenal character of experience. The commentary suggests that alternative frameworks may better address the relationship between neural activity and conscious experience.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that Manzotti's neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing face conceptual difficulties in defining the boundaries and location of consciousness. |
Abstract
Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".