Skip to content

Relation between Psychedelic and Transcendental Experiences

Frederick Travis

International Journal of Psychological Studies November 1, 2022 DOI: 10.5539/ijps.v14n4p31 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Transcendental meditation Consciousness Transcendental number Content measure theory Psychotherapist Electroencephalography Cognitive psychology Epistemology Theology
Key points Argues that psychedelic and transcendental meditation experiences are fundamentally different across EEG, brain blood-flow, experiential content, mechanism, and therapeutic application, making it inaccurate to equate them.

Abstract

Psychedelic use is generally considered safe, and their effects are being equated with those of meditation practices. To assess these conclusions, this paper compares psychedelic and meditation experiences in terms of 1) EEG patterns, 2) brain blood-flow patterns, 3) content of experience, 4) mechanism of action, and 5) therapeutic application. On these five factors, psychedelic and transcendental experiences during meditation practice are completely different: gamma vs alpha EEG; decreased brain blood-flow vs higher frontal blood-flow; intense mental and emotional content vs content-free self-awareness; influenced by the set and setting vs transcending the set and setting. Since brain patterns and inner experiences differ, it is not accurate to equate psychedelic and transcendental experiences or to use effects or mechanism of one to justify the other. Yes, carefully designed research into both psychedelic and transcendental experiences should continue. But the results of these studies should not be superficially combined.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics