Skip to content

The "vine of the soul" vs. the Controlled Substances Act: implications of the hoasca case.

Ronald K Bullis

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs June 1, 2008 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2008.10400630 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Topics Ayahuasca
Citations 24
Key points Argues that the 2006 Supreme Court decision on hoasca use by a religious group has broad implications for religious freedom involving sacramental psychotropics and provides a framework for future cases.

Abstract

In 2006, the Supreme Court paved the way for the sacramental use of a hallucinogen, hoasca, to be imported, distributed and ingested by a religious group. This case has broad implications for religious freedom for using sacramental psychotropics and how such cases might be decided in the future. This article outlines the arguments used both by the church and by the government. It lists the facts of the cases, explains and analyzes the decision, evaluates the likelihood of expansions of religion-based exceptions for entheogen use in light of the Supreme Court's decision and offers a profile for those groups most likely to receive such an exemption.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on ayahuasca, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics