Skip to content

Cautions on the Notion of Moral Enhancement with Psychedelics. Reply to Kähönen, J. Subjective Effects of Psychedelics Are the Plausible Mechanism of Psychedelic Moral Enhancement Rather than a Risk. Comment on “Tang, B.L. Psychedelics for Moral Bioenhancement in Healthy Individuals—A Violation of the Non-Maleficence Principle? Psychoactives 2025, 4, 5”

Bor Luen Tang

Psychoactives December 17, 2025 DOI: 10.3390/psychoactives4040044 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary or response article Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the notion of moral enhancement with psychedelics needs substantially more scientific evidence and extended bioethical debates.

Abstract

Kähönen argued that the harms associated with psychedelics have been overstated, while evidence for the latter’s moral enhancing effects was disregarded, in my earlier commentary. Here, I respond to these arguments and maintain that the notion of moral enhancement with psychedelics needs substantially more scientific evidence and extended bioethical debates.

Citations in the library