Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Hatice Guncu Kurt, Murat Altinay, Amit Anand

Psychiatric Annals February 1, 2020 DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20200113-01 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Randomized Placebo-controlled Open-label Peer reviewed
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Key findings Ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy have response and remission rates at the higher end of the ranges seen for other treatments for treatment-resistant depression, with the advantage of fast action.

Abstract

Patients who have not responded to two antidepressant trials in their current depressive episode are usually considered to have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A detailed search on PubMed was conducted for reported response and remission rates for non-ketamine and ketamine treatments for TRD. From a variety of pharmacological and brain stimulation open-label studies, the treatments were found to have similar response and remission rates of 30% to 70% and 20% to 50%, respectively. For randomized placebo-controlled trials, reported response and remission rates were 15% to 60% and 10% to 40%, respectively. Ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy both have response and remission rates at the higher end of these ranges, and their significant advantage is their fast action in an acute setting. Direct comparative efficacy studies with large sample sizes will be needed to establish any margin of increased benefit of one treatment modality compared to the other. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2020;50(2):62–67.]

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Explore topics

By condition and practice