Skip to content

Effects of repeated intravenous esketamine administration on affective biases.

Christine Reif-Leonhard, Shannon N Millard, Dorsa Ferdowssian, Ailidh Finlayson, Mareike Aichholzer, Jonathan Repple, Michael Stäblein, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Xudong Wang, Gerard R Dawson, Andreas Reif, Asad Malik

The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2024.2441304 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 18
Population Treatment-resistant depression patients
Intervention Esketamine
Topics Esketamine
Keywords Ema Rapid acting antidepressant Dosing Prediction #antidepressants depression medication Mood stabilizers #neuropsychology brain science Cognitive psychology Neuroscience #esketamine ketamine Rapid-acting antidepressant Raat
Citations 3
Key findings Esketamine improved emotion recognition for all emotions except sadness, where accuracy decreased, and reduced response bias towards sadness, alongside improvements in mood and cognitive functioning.

Abstract

While neuropsychological effects of conventional antidepressants are well-documented, more research is needed for rapid-acting antidepressants. This study examines the effects of esketamine on emotion processing and cognitive functioning, both acutely and sub-chronically. Eighteen treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients received repeated intravenous esketamine infusions. Mood state was reported daily, and the Facial Expression Recognition Task was administered 1h before and 4h after each infusion. Other assessments included the Digit Symbol Substitution Task. 66.7% participants who received at least five infusions (n = 12) showed significant improvement. Emotion recognition improved for all emotions except sadness, where accuracy decreased, particularly for low-intensity expressions (p = .007, d = -1.09). Misclassifications of other emotions as sad also decreased (p = .035, d = -0.79), indicating a reduced response bias towards sadness. This shift in bias emerged after the first infusion and then consolidated over time. In parallel, participants showed significant reductions in feelings of sadness (p = .015, d = -0.89) and irritability (p = .001, d = -1.35). Symptomatic improvement negatively correlated with accuracy for and misclassifications of sadness, and cognitive functioning also improved (p = .001, d = 1.62). Improvement of TRD by esketamine may involve shifts in emotion processing and cognition, with the acute mood-lifting effects of esketamine being discernible from longer-lasting antidepressant response, which consolidates after repeated administration.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics