Skip to content

Intranasal Esketamine Versus Other Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Depression with High Suicide Risk: A Six-Month Naturalistic Study.

Ana María De Granda-Beltrán, Alejandro Porras-Segovia, Daniel Núñez-arias, Alba Rodríguez-jover, Maria Paula Jassir Acosta, Philippe Courtet, Enrique Baca-García, Inmaculada Peñuelas‐calvo

Clinics and practice June 12, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract16060110 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Naturalistic prospective cohort study Peer reviewed
Sample size 62
Population Treatment-resistant depression patients with high suicide risk
Interventions Intranasal esketamine alternative pharmacological interventions
Duration 6-month follow-up
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Naturalistic study Suicidal behavior
Key findings Intranasal esketamine was associated with faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms compared to alternative pharmacological interventions.

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses a major clinical challenge, particularly when accompanied by suicidal behavior. Intranasal esketamine has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in TRD, but real-world comparative evidence remains limited.

Methods: We conducted a six-month naturalistic prospective cohort study in two Spanish mental health centers, including 62 TRD patients with high suicide risk undergoing fourth-line treatment. Thirty patients received intranasal esketamine and thirty-two alternative pharmacological interventions. Suicidal ideation (C-SSRS), depressive symptoms (HAM-D-17) and functional status (FAST) were assessed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement during follow-up; however, esketamine-treated patients exhibited a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms than those receiving alternative pharmacological strategies. The number needed to treat to prevent one case of high suicide risk was 1.35. Functional improvement was comparable between groups.

Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, intranasal esketamine was associated with a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms among TRD patients with high suicide risk, supporting its role as a rapid-acting therapeutic option within comprehensive and closely monitored care.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Explore topics

By condition and practice