Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Combined with Antidepressants for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Meta-Analysis

Peng Liu, Shanshan Zhang, Yun Liang, Zijun Gao, Wei Gao, Buhuai Dong

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment December 1, 2022 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s388764 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Double-blind Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,252
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression
Intervention Esketamine + antidepressant
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Meta-analysis Antidepressant Depression economics Rating scale Placebo Randomized controlled trial
Citations 16
Key findings Esketamine plus antidepressant significantly reduced depression severity and improved response and remission rates compared with placebo plus antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of esketamine + antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to obtain published information on esketamine + antidepressant from inception to July 2022. We searched for randomized controlled studies on the treatment of depression with a double-blind induction phase. Outcome indicators included changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores before and after treatment, effective response rate, remission rate, and changes in self-rating depression scale (SDS). We analyzed data using Review Manager 5.4 and assessed the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis.

Results: A total of seven articles were included, including 701 patients in the esketamine + antidepressant group and 551 in the placebo group. Meta-analysis results showed that esketamine + antidepressant could improve the MADRS score in patients with treatment-resistant depression (MD = -2.68, 95% CI -3.98 to -1.37, P < 0.0001), SDS (MD = -2.9, 95% CI -4.01 to -1.79, P < 0.00001), response rate at the end of the double-blind induction period (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.46, P = 0.0002), remission rate at the end of the double-blind induction period (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.63, P < 0.0001), Five-Dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D-5L) (MD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.08, P = 0.00009), Visual Analogue Scale of Health Status (EQ-VAS) (MD = 5.54, 95% CI 2.37 to 8.71, P = 0.0006).

Conclusion: Esketamine + antidepressant has an obvious curative effect in treatment-resistant depression and can rapidly improve depression in patients, quality of life and satisfaction, but minor adverse reactions can occur.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in randomized controlled trials of ketamine for suicidal ideation 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 197
Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with major depressive disorder who are treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 774
Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2025 Systematic review and meta-analysis
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RACEMIC KETAMINE AND ESKETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2022 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 2,903

Explore topics

By condition and practice