A landscape analysis of psychedelic facilitation training in the US.
Roman Palitsky, Caroline Peacock, Jeffrey A. Breau, Paul Gillis-Smith, Gosia Sklodowska
PLoS One May 29, 2026 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350037 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Quality improvement approach with interviews Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 13 |
| Population | Established and emerging psychedelic facilitation training organizations from the US |
| Key points | Psychedelic facilitation training programs share common priorities such as careful selection of trainees and faculty and addressing spiritual topics, but gaps exist in continuing education, parity with other disciplines, and field standards. |
Abstract
Skilled interpersonal support and safety monitoring can enhance the therapeutic potential of psychedelic compounds and reduce the potential for harm. In the anticipation of legalized psychedelic care, and the recognition of ongoing psychedelic use across a variety of contexts, numerous training programs have been established to educate psychedelic facilitators in supporting individuals who take psychedelics. However, psychedelic facilitation training in the US has not been well characterized, making it difficult to appraise the strengths, needs, and gaps in this emerging discipline, especially with regard to the development of competencies in spiritually responsive care. This project used a quality improvement approach to identify common priorities, practices, needs, and gaps in the emerging field of psychedelic facilitation training from the standpoint of 13 established and emerging training organizations from the US. Interviews were conducted with one or more representatives from each participating organization. Notes from these interviews, once confirmed by the interviewees, were synthesized to identify common practices, procedures, priorities, and gaps. Areas of focus among the programs included: careful selection of trainees and faculty; content emphases in instruction; addressing spiritual, existential, religious, and theological topics; and teaching strategies used in programs. Several gaps were also identified, pointing to the need for continuing education among program graduates, parity with other disciplines, and development of field standards in training facilitators. Psychedelic facilitation training is an evolving discipline. Training programs and trainees may benefit from greater collaboration, including ongoing exchange about best practices and adjustments to scientific, social, economic, and regulatory developments.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Epistemic Discipline in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy: Memory, Therapy Dynamics, Attachment Patterns, and Sexual Abuse Neuroethics December 1, 2026
- Ethics of psychedelics in clinical research: a state-of-the-field review JME Practical Bioethics October 9, 2026
- Ayahuasca Ceremony and Scope of Nursing Practice
Cites 33
- Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology July 1, 2008
- Classic psychedelics: An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function. Pharmacology & Therapeutics May 1, 2019
- Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica October 30, 2020
- Extended difficulties following the use of psychedelic drugs: A mixed methods study PLoS One October 24, 2023
- Ayahuasca Shamanism in the Amazon and Beyond Oxford University Press eBooks June 18, 2014
and 28 more in the library