A putative implication for fronto-parietal connectivity in out-of-body experiences
Sally Easton, Olaf Blanke, Christine Mohr
Cortex October 31, 2008 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.012 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 47 |
| Population | Healthy participants with and without previous out-of-body experiences |
| Citations | 56 |
| Key findings | Individuals with previous OBEs show reduced performance on switch trials between embodied and disembodied self-location tasks, indicating impaired fronto-parietal connectivity. |
Abstract
Self-processing has been related to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) as well as to their connectivity. So far, out-of-body experiences (OBEs), impressive transient deviations of intact bodily self-integration, could be associated with the TPJ, but the mediation by the frontal lobe, and thus fronto-parietal connectivity, is yet unknown. Thus, we assessed switching performance to assess fronto-parietal connectivity when healthy participants [11 reported previous OBEs (OBE-individuals); 36 reported no previous OBEs (nOBE-individuals)] performed two different mental own body imagery tasks. By using the same stimuli of a front-facing and back-facing human figure, a cue simultaneously presented with the target indicated to participants whether they had to take the position of the depicted human figure (disembodied self-location mimicking an OBE) or had to imagine that the figure was their own reflection in a mirror (embodied Self-location). By repeating trials of the same task instruction for a differing number of trials (2-6 trials), we could assess switch costs when alternating between these two task instructions with switch costs being considered to be a behavioural indicator of fronto-parietal connectivity. Results showed that OBE-individuals performed worse than nOBE-individuals in switch trials, but not in trials in which the same task instruction was repeated. Moreover, this reduced performance was specific to body positions that are normally considered easier (front-facing in the mirror condition; back-facing in the OBE mimicking condition). These findings suggest that a fronto-parietal network might be implicated in OBEs, and that the flexible and spontaneous egocentric perspective taking of self-congruent body representations is hampered in individuals with previous OBEs.
Citations in the library
Cited by 19
- The body unbound: Vestibular–motor hallucinations and out-of-body experiences Cortex June 6, 2008
- Self-specific processing in the meditating brain: a MEG neurophenomenology study. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2016
- The incidence and determinants of visual phenomenology during out-of-body experiences Cortex June 6, 2008
- THE NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY OF OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCES INDUCED BY HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis January 2, 2019
- Out of body experiences: Scoping review. Explore June 4, 2025
and 14 more in the library
Cites 18
- Out‐of‐body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin Brain January 15, 2004
- Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction Journal of Neuroscience January 19, 2005
- Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin Brain Research Reviews July 13, 2005
- The body unbound: Vestibular–motor hallucinations and out-of-body experiences Cortex June 6, 2008
- The incidence and determinants of visual phenomenology during out-of-body experiences Cortex June 6, 2008
and 13 more in the library