Skip to content

Dynamic changes in prefrontal cortex gene expression following lysergic acid diethylamide administration

Charles D. Nichols, Efrain E. Garcia, Elaine Sanders‐bush

Molecular Brain Research March 1, 2003 DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(03)00029-9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Population Rat prefrontal cortex
Intervention LSD
Topics LSD Serotonin
Keywords Prefrontal cortex Gene expression Genetics Cognition Receptor
Citations 1
Key findings Gene expression in the rat prefrontal cortex after LSD is dynamic and mostly mediated by the 5-HT(2A) receptor, with two genes showing no dependence on 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(2A) receptors.

Abstract

Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is a psychoactive drug that transiently alters human perception, behavior, and mood at extremely low doses. Certain aspects of the behavior elicited by acute doses of LSD closely resemble symptoms of mental disorders such as schizophrenia. Characterizing gene expression profiles after LSD will be important for understanding how it alters behavior, and will lead to novel insights into disorders, such as schizophrenia, whose behavioral symptoms resemble the temporary effects of hallucinogenic drugs. We previously identified a small collection of genes within the rat prefrontal cortex that respond to LSD. Many of the products of these genes are involved in the process of synaptic plasticity. In the current report, we present a detailed analysis of the expression of these genes within the brain using RNase protection analysis. We find that the gene response to LSD is quite dynamic. The expression of some genes increases rapidly and decreases rapidly, while other genes change more gradually. Dose-response studies show two classes of expression; gene expression maximally stimulated at lower doses, versus gene expression that continues to rise at the higher doses. The role of the 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptor in mediating the increases in gene expression was examined in a series of experiments using receptor specific antagonists. Most expression increases were due to activation of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, however expression of two genes had neither a 5-HT(1A) nor a 5-HT(2A) receptor component.

Explore topics