Skip to content

Adverse event reporting and management in psilocybin therapy clinical trials: A systematic review to guide clinical and research protocol development

Danielle Bukovsky, Aron Amaev, Jianmeng Song, S. Lauren Kyte, Edgardo Carmona-Torres, Fumihiko Ueno, Vincenzo de Luca, Antonio P. Strafella, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Ariel Graff‐guerrero, Philip Gerretsen

Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry October 23, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111541 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,068
Population Participants in clinical studies of psilocybin
Intervention Psilocybin
Topics Psilocybin
Keywords Adverse effect Psycinfo Medline Protocol science Intervention counseling Systematic review Intensive care medicine Depression economics Reporting bias Clinical trial Suicidal ideation
Key findings Psilocybin appears to have a favorable safety profile in controlled settings, with serious adverse events reported infrequently and limited to participants with underlying depressive disorders.

Abstract

Psilocybin, a psychedelic prodrug, has gained renewed interest for its potential to treat various psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders. While promising, concerns remain regarding its safety profile and the management of potential adverse events (AEs). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with psilocybin use across diverse clinical populations. A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsycInfo via the OVID platform, from database inception to June 5, 2024. A total of 42 clinical studies (N = 1068 participants) met inclusion criteria, all of which reported on AEs and/or SAEs following psilocybin administration. All studies were deemed to have a high risk of bias due to concerns regarding blinding. We synthesized information on common, uncommon, and SAEs, instances of suicidal ideation, methods of measuring AEs, and AEs requiring medical intervention. Reported AEs included headache, transient increases in blood pressure, and nausea, which typically resolved on their own. In rare instances, medical intervention was required. SAEs were reported infrequently in 2 of 42 studies and were limited to participants with underlying depressive disorders (e.g., suicidal behaviour, hospitalization). Overall, psilocybin appears to have a favourable safety profile when administered in controlled settings. Based on our findings, we provide an outline of commonly reported AEs, uncommon AEs, SAEs, and considerations for future clinical and research protocols.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials 2021 Systematic review
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review
The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression 2020 Meta-analysis n = 117
Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A Systematic Review Participants from included studies 2022 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics