Skip to content

Low-income group psilocybin assisted therapy for depression: An Oregon feasibility study

Matthew Hicks, Olivia Hicks, Ryan Bradley, Heather Zwickey

Journal of Psychedelic Studies February 12, 2026 DOI: 10.1556/2054.2026.00485 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Open-label, uncontrolled feasibility study Peer reviewed
Sample size 20
Population Low-income adults with depression in Oregon's regulated psilocybin program
Intervention two psilocybin administration sessions
Duration Two administration sessions one week apart, with preparation and integration sessions
Topics Psilocybin Depression
Keywords Adverse effect Depression economics Population Hallucinogen Randomized controlled trial Clinical trial Intervention counseling Cohort Exploratory research
Citations 2
Key points Group psilocybin therapy is feasible for low-income adults with depression, with no severe adverse events and high satisfaction, and exploratory outcomes showed significant improvements in depression scores and quality of life domains.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Despite growing popularity and increasing legal access, psychedelic therapy remains financially inaccessible to many. This study was designed to test the feasibility of conducting group psilocybin therapy in low-income adults with depression in Oregon's regulated psilocybin program.

Methods: An open label, uncontrolled design was used. After a medical screening visit, participants were enrolled in cohorts of six. Each cohort participated in two 90-min preparation sessions conducted online followed by two psilocybin administration sessions one week apart where they consumed dehydrated and homogenized whole mushrooms, Psilocybe cubensis (B+ strain) prepared in a tea. Two days after each psilocybin administration they had an online, 90-min integration session.

Results: We recruited 26 eligible participants, 20 of whom began treatment and 19 completed. No severe adverse events were reported, and participants rated their satisfaction, on average, as 4.8 out of 5, reporting moderate to high benefit and no harm. Exploratory outcomes include Hamilton Depression scores which demonstrated a significant decrease ( t = 8.24, p < 0.001) in a paired t -test and a strong effect size (Cohen's d = 1.89). For the same time periods all eight domains of the PROMIS-29 were significantly improved on paired t -tests at p < .01 with effect sizes ranging from 0.667 to 1.774.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates the feasibility of group psilocybin therapy in a low-income population with depression. Further research with rigorous comparator groups is warranted to assess if this intervention can be both effective and cost-effective.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on psilocybin for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Patients with moderate-to-severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression 2016 Open-label feasibility trial n = 12
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Patients with severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression 2017 Open-label trial n = 20
Quality of Acute Psychedelic Experience Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy of Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients with treatment-resistant depression 2018 Clinical trial n = 20
Psilocybin therapy increases cognitive and neural flexibility in patients with major depressive disorder. Patients with major depressive disorder 2021 Open-label study n = 24
Increased amygdala responses to emotional faces after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe, treatment-resistant depression 2017 Open-label study n = 20

Explore topics

By condition and practice