The Acute Effect in Rats of 3, 4‐Methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDEA, “Eve”) on Body Temperature and Long Term Degeneration of 5‐HT Neurones in Brain: A Comparison with MDMA (“Ecstasy”)
María Isabel Colado, Raquel Ena María Granados, Esther O’shea, B. Moreno Esteban, Alfred Richard Green
Pharmacology & Toxicology June 1, 1999 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1999.tb01492.x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental animal study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Dark Agouti rats |
| Interventions | MDEA MDMA |
| Dose | 35 mg/kg intraperitoneally (MDEA), 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally (MDMA) |
| Duration | 7 days |
| Topics | MDMA Serotonin |
| Keywords | Pharmacology Neurotoxicity Hippocampus Hyperthermia Dopamine Striatum Acute toxicity Anesthesia |
| Citations | 26 |
| Key findings | MDEA (eve) is less potent than MDMA (ecstasy) in causing acute hyperthermia and serotonin neurotoxicity in rats, but because higher doses of MDEA are probably required for mood effects, the data do not support MDEA as a safer recreational drug. |
Abstract
Abstract: Administration of a single dose of the recreationally used drug 3, 4‐methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDEA or “eve”) to Dark Agouti rats resulted in an acute dose‐dependent hyperthermic response. The peak effect and duration of hyperthermia of a dose of MDEA of 35 mg/kg intraperitoneally was similar to a dose of 3, 4‐methylenedioxymetham‐phetamine (MDMA or “ecstasy”) of 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Seven days later this dose of MDMA produced a marked (50%) loss of 5‐HT and its metabolite 5‐HIAA in cortex, hippocampus and striatum and a similar loss of [ 3 H]‐paroxetine binding in cortex; these losses reflecting the MDMA‐induced neurotoxic degeneration of 5‐HT nerve endings. In contrast, administration of MDEA (15, 25 or 35 mg/kg), even at the highest dose, produced only a 20% loss in cortex and hippocampus and no decrease in striatum. The neurotoxic effect of MDEA was only weakly dose‐dependent. Neither MDEA (35 mg/kg) nor MDMA (15 mg/kg) altered striata! dopamine content 7 days later. MDEA appeared to have about half the potency of MDMA in inducing acute hyperthermia and 25% of the potency in inducing degeneration of cerebral 5‐HT neurones. However since higher doses of MDEA (compared to MDMA) are probably necessary to induce mood changing effects, these data do not support any contention that this compound is a “safer′’recreational drug than MDMA in terms of either acute toxicity or long term neurodegeneration.
Comparable studies
Other preclinical and animal studies on MDMA, most cited first.
Citations in the library
Cited by 10
- Effects of MDMA, MDA and MDEA on blood pressure, heart rate, locomotor activity and body temperature in the rat involveα‐adrenoceptors British Journal of Pharmacology February 20, 2006
- Beyond ecstasy: Alternative entactogens to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine with potential applications in psychotherapy Journal of Psychopharmacology September 10, 2020
- The Neuropsychopharmacology and Toxicology of 3,4‐methylenedioxy‐N‐ethyl‐amphetamine (MDEA) CNS Drug Reviews June 1, 2004
- Downregulation of the Vitamin D Receptor Regulated Gene Set in the Hippocampus After MDMA Treatment. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2018
- Pharmacology of MDMA- and Amphetamine-Like New Psychoactive Substances. Handbook of experimental pharmacology 2018
and 5 more in the library
Cites 18
- 'Eve' and 'Ecstasy'. A report of five deaths associated with the use of MDEA and MDMA JAMA March 27, 1987
- Pathology of deaths associated with "ecstasy" and "eve" misuse. Journal of Clinical Pathology February 1, 1996
- 'Eve' and 'Ecstasy' JAMA March 27, 1987
- In vivo evidence for free radical involvement in the degeneration of rat brain 5‐HT following administration of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) and p‐chloroamphetamine but not the degeneration following fenfluramine British Journal of Pharmacology July 1, 1997
- The hyperthermic and neurotoxic effects of ‘Ecstasy’ (MDMA) and 3,4 methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) in the Dark Agouti (DA) rat, a model of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype British Journal of Pharmacology August 1, 1995
and 13 more in the library