Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Direct Screening of Urine for MDMA and MDA by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry*

Helena K. Nordgren, Olof Beck

Journal of Analytical Toxicology January 1, 2003 DOI: 10.1093/jat/27.1.15 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization detected MDMA and MDA in urine with a 100 ng/mL cutoff and 10% coefficient of variation. In 1000 clinical patient urine samples, the LC-MS-MS method identified nearly four times as many MDMA-positive samples as the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative. The findings suggest LC-MS-MS is a viable alternative to immunochemical screening for drugs of abuse.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Method comparison study Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,000
Population Clinical patient urine samples
Keywords Chemistry Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Urine Tandem mass spectrometry
Citations 43
Key finding LC-MS-MS detected almost four times as many MDMA-positive urine samples as the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative.

Abstract

There is a limit in the number of substances detected by commercially available reagents. It is therefore important to have other, complementary techniques. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) may offer one possibility. An LC-MS-MS procedure based on the detection of positive ions after atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) was developed for direct measurement of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine in urine. It was compared with Online Amphetamines. The LC-MS-MS methodology showed improved sensitivity (1 00-ng/mL cutoff and specificity with a coefficient of variation of 10%. It was compared to the immunochemical analysis using 1000 clinical patient urine samples. The positive samples were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The LC-MS-MS method detected almost four times as many samples positive for MDMA compared to the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative. Our study suggests that LC-MS-MS offers an alternative to immunochemical methods in drug of abuse screening.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment