Skip to content

A preliminary proof-of-concept trial on the effects of ketamine on fatigue: a randomized crossover trial.

Taichi Goto, Joy D Kreskow, Alexander L R Ross, Catherine L Blumhorst, Justin J Zhao, Andrew J Mannes, Miroslav Bačkonja, Carlos A. Zarate, Leorey N Saligan

Pharmacological Reports January 22, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Double-blind Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Adults who are cancer survivors or have fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus
Interventions Ketamine Midazolam
Dose 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 0.045 mg/kg midazolam
Duration Single infusion, 3-day post-infusion follow-up
Topics Esketamine Ketamine
Keywords Active placebo Chronic illness Glutamate receptor Midazolam Pilot study
Key findings Ketamine did not produce a statistically significant greater reduction in fatigue than midazolam, but a 38.7% peak reduction was observed one day after ketamine infusion.

Abstract

Fatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator. Ten participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine). The two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1. Despite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on ketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Subanesthetic Effects of the Noncompetitive NMDA Antagonist, Ketamine, in Humans Healthy human subjects recruited from the community 1994 Randomized controlled trial n = 19
Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial Patients with treatment-resistant major depression experiencing a major depressive episode 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 73
Remifentanil-induced Postoperative Hyperalgesia and Its Prevention with Small-dose Ketamine Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery 2005 Randomized controlled trial n = 75
Efficacy of Intravenous Ketamine for Treatment of Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Patients with chronic PTSD related to a range of trauma exposures 2014 Randomized controlled trial n = 41
Ketamine-Induced Deficits in Auditory and Visual Context-Dependent Processing in Healthy Volunteers Healthy volunteers 2000 Single-blind placebo-controlled study n = 20

Citations in the library

Explore topics