Skip to content

Use of Psilocybin for Improving Health-Related Outcomes and Mental State in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

John M. Pederson, Kathryn Cowie, Averi Barrett, Lauren Siegel, Hannah Lyons, Kevin M. Kallmes, Alexander Mebane, Alan K. Davis

August 22, 2022 DOI: 10.2196/preprints.42052 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized
Population Patients with major depressive disorder, including those with treatment-resistant MDD and those with MDD and life-threatening illness
Intervention Psilocybin
Dose 20-30 mg/70 kg
Topics Anxiety Depression Psilocybin
Keywords Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial Clinical psychology Depression economics Hallucinogen Mood
Key findings The review aims to provide an up-to-date, transparent synthesis of psilocybin's efficacy and safety for MDD, addressing gaps in the current evidence base.

Abstract

Background: Psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychedelic that induces feelings of euphoria and spiritual awakening when administered in doses of approximately 20-30 mg/70 kg. In the last decade, there has been renewed interest in using psilocybin for major depressive disorder (MDD).

Objective: This individual patient data meta-analysis will investigate the efficacy and safety of psilocybin for MDD.

Methods: This study will be performed as a living systematic review housed in the Nested Knowledge online platform, allowing for data extraction, analysis, and synthesis to occur on an ongoing basis as new evidence emerges. The study is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021290905) and will be compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD). Major databases (PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, PyschINFO) and international clinical trials registries will be systematically searched for relevant trials. Randomized and non-randomized trials of psilocybin for the treatment of MDD will be included; authors will be contacted if individual patient data is not readily available. The three populations of interest are patients with MDD, patients with treatment-resistant MDD, and patients with MDD and life-threatening illness. The primary outcome is depression as measured by validated clinical scales (e.g., GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [GRID-HAMD], Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Subscale [HADS-D]). Heterogeneous scale results will be transformed to z-scores and aggregated to create a composite depression outcome. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, demoralization/hopelessness, quality of life, and death acceptance. We will analyze outcome data using hierarchical mixed-effects regression models. In order to consider clustering effects from study to study, a three-level hierarchical structure will be used: the participants within each trial are considered level one, the study is level two, and the treatment group is level three. Hierarchical regressions are also conducted to examine various effect moderators of treatment outcomes, including patient age, patient sex, baseline score for a given clinical outcome, history of psilocybin use, and psilocybin dose (including the interaction of dose volume and dose schedule). All analyses will be performed on a modified intention-to-treat basis. Repeat literature searches, screening, and subsequent updates to the review will be conducted on an ongoing basis.

Results: The initial review and subsequent updates will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and made available online via the Nested Knowledge platform.

Conclusions: Despite growing interest in psilocybin as a therapy for chronic, severe, or intractable MDD, there are gaps in the literature. A rapidly expanding evidence base requires a living systematic review to adequately inform clinical practice and policymaking around psychedelics for psychological and mood disorders. This meta-analysis seeks to meet that need by providing a transparent, up-to-date, and accessible living review of psilocybin for MDD.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin for anxiety, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review
The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression 2020 Meta-analysis n = 117
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of serotonergic psychedelics for the management of mood, anxiety, and substance-use disorders: a systematic review of systematic reviews Patients with mood, anxiety, or substance-use disorders, including cancer patients and... 2018 Systematic review of systematic reviews
A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy 2020 Systematic review

Explore topics

By condition and practice