Skip to content

Oral esketamine for patients with severe treatment-resistant depression: Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a six-week open-label treatment program.

Jolien Ke Veraart, Sanne Y Smith-Apeldoorn, Annemarie van der Meij, Jan Spijker, Robert A Schoevers, Jeanine Kamphuis

Journal of Psychopharmacology April 25, 2025 DOI: 10.1177/02698811251332831 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Naturalistic study Open-label Peer reviewed
Sample size 185
Population Adults with severe treatment-resistant depression
Intervention Oral esketamine
Dose 0.5 to 3 mg/kg
Duration 6-week intervention
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Keywords Oral esketamine Real-world effectiveness Mental health treatment Clinical research
Citations 6
Key points Oral esketamine treatment improved depressive symptom severity in highly treatment-resistant patients, with outcomes comparable to other routes of ketamine administration.

Abstract

Oral esketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) could offer certain advantages over other routes, such as intravenous or intranasal, but it has not been systematically studied in a real-world setting. Here we present results from a relatively large naturalistic study to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of oral esketamine in patients with TRD. One hundred eighty-five adults with severe TRD (average of 8.1 antidepressant trials plus electroconvulsive therapy in 63% without beneficial outcome) received oral esketamine treatment twice-weekly for 6 weeks with individually titrated doses ranging from 0.5 to 3 mg/kg. Outcome measures included change from baseline to week 6 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), response, remission, self-reported symptom improvement, functioning, and side effects. Oral esketamine treatment improved depressive symptom severity on the HDRS17 from 21.2 to 15.8 (p < 0.001). MCID, response, and remission rates were 47.1%, 26.8% and 15.6% respectively. In 45.9% of participants, treatment was continued after 6 weeks to maintain initial positive effects. Side effects were reported frequently but were overall well tolerated. The drop-out rate was 7.6%. We found no significant adverse effects associated with urinary tract or cognition. Repeated treatment with oral esketamine is effective in improving depressive symptom severity in highly treatment-resistant depressive patients. It is safe, well tolerated, and patient-friendly. Considering the level of treatment resistance, outcomes were in the range of studies investigating other routes of (es)ketamine administration.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 49

and 44 more in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice