Skip to content

History, Hype, and Responsible Psychedelic Medicine: A Qualitative Study of Psychedelic Researchers.

Michaela Barber, John Gardner, Adrian Carter

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry October 4, 2024 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10386-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Qualitative study Case report Peer reviewed
Sample size 14
Population Australian psychedelic researchers
Topics Psychedelic-assisted therapy
Keywords Psychedelic medicine Psychedelic treatments Psychedelic drugs Psychedelic science Ethical development Responsible development Medical ethics Safety standards Regulatory ethics Ethical research Psychedelic ethics Medical integration Future of medicine Patient care Therapeutic integration Psychedelic healthcare integration
Citations 12
Key findings Psychedelic researchers' views reveal tensions as the field grows from a small group with a shared worldview to a regulated industry, with overarching concerns for protecting the field from premature discontinuation and maximizing positive impacts.

Abstract

Background: Psychedelic medicine is a rapidly growing area of research and policy change. Australia recently became the first country to legalize the prescription of psychedelics and serves as a case study of issues that may emerge in other jurisdictions. Despite their influence as a stakeholder group, there has been little empirical exploration of psychedelic researchers' views on the development of psychedelic research and the ethical concerns.

Methods: We thematically analysed fourteen interviews with Australian psychedelic researchers.

Results: Three themes were constructed from the data: 1) coming out of the shadow of the 1960s, 2) challenges and affordances in engaging stakeholders, and 3) growing pains in innovation and translation.

Conclusion: The results illustrated tensions arising from the rapid growth of psychedelic research from a small group of dedicated individuals with a similar worldview, to a multi-interest, regulated industry. Participants' experiences and viewpoints were influenced by the history of psychedelic research, and this was met with an overarching concern for protecting the field from premature discontinuation, as well as maximizing potential positive impacts. Targets for stakeholder collaboration and initiatives to support responsible innovation in psychedelics include equitable access, sustainable industry involvement, productive research agendas, responsible reporting of evidence, and risk-taking within the relative safety of clinical trials.

Comparable studies

Other qualitative studies on psychedelic-assisted therapy, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Patients’ Accounts of Increased “Connectedness” and “Acceptance” After Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients with treatment-resistant depression enrolled in an open-label trial of psilocybin 2017 Qualitative study n = 20
LSD-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with a life-threatening disease: A qualitative study of acute and sustained subjective effects Patients with anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases 2014 Prospective follow-up with qualitative content analysis n = 10
Patient Experiences of Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Adults aged 22 to 69 with clinically elevated anxiety associated with a cancer diagnosis 2017 Qualitative study n = 13
Psychedelic therapy for smoking cessation: Qualitative analysis of participant accounts Participants who completed a psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation pilot study 2018 Qualitative follow-up study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis n = 12
The hidden therapist: evidence for a central role of music in psychedelic therapy Patients undergoing psychedelic therapy with psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression 2018 Qualitative study n = 19

Citations in the library

Cited by 12

and 7 more in the library

Cites 39

and 34 more in the library

Explore topics