Skip to content

The perspectives of patients with depression toward esketamine, and the influence of their medication adherence on their viewpoints: a Saudi cross-sectional study.

Ahmad H Almadani, Ayedh H Alghamdi, Fahad B Alfahad, Abdullah S Alibrahim, Abdulrahman I Binbakhit, Ziyad B Alenazi, Lama M Alruwaili, Abdulrahman A Alshahwan, Abdullah K Muhnna, Mohammed A Aljaffer

Frontiers in Psychiatry 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1678119 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 283
Population Adults with depression
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Saudi arabia Perspectives Medication adherence challenges
Key findings 52.3% of participants were willing to receive esketamine, but 79.5% reported cost as a potential barrier, and 77.4% were nonadherent to their current medication regimen.

Abstract

Nasal esketamine has demonstrated efficacy in the management of treatment-resistant depression and psychiatric emergency due to major depression. This study investigates acceptance and awareness of esketamine as a depression treatment option, focusing on factors that influence patients' acceptance, including adherence to current medication regimens, regardless of prior esketamine exposure. This cross-sectional study surveyed 283 adults with depression using a questionnaire and the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS-10). 52.3% of participants were willing to receive esketamine, and 51.2% preferred its weekly or biweekly dosing over daily antidepressants; 79.5% reported cost as a potential barrier. Common concerns included medication unavailability (59.7%), fear of addiction (50.5%), anticipated stigma (24.4%), and first-month dosing frequency (21.2%). Regarding adherence, 77.4% were nonadherent to their current psychiatric medication regimen. Adherence to the current regimen was higher among patients with previous esketamine use (p <.001) and among those who had someone to stay with them during and after treatment (p = .047). Patients are open to esketamine but have concerns that must be addressed. It also highlights non-adherence as a significant issue in patients with depression. These findings highlight the importance of patients' education, family involvement, and logistical supports.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
A Real-World Study on the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: INTEGRATE Study. Adults aged 18-74 years with treatment-resistant depression in Spain 2025 Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study n = 196
Addressing diversity gaps in esketamine clinical trials: a registry-based cross-sectional analysis of sex, race and ethnicity. Participants in interventional esketamine trials with results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026 Registry-based cross-sectional analysis n = 5,116
Mental health professionals' perspective on the use of esketamine in treatment-resistant depression and their motivation to adopt it: a Saudi cross-sectional study. Psychiatrists (of all levels, including those in training) across Saudi Arabia 2026 Cross-sectional study n = 223
Characteristics of patients with major depressive disorder eligible for and prescribed esketamine, treatment outcomes and physician experiences: a physician and patient survey in the United States. Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) or major depression with acute... 2025 Cross-sectional survey n = 914
Is approving esketamine as an antidepressant for treatment resistant depression associated with recreational use and risk perception of ketamine? Results from a longitudinal and cross-sectional survey in nightlife attendees. UK residents aged 18-34 who attended at least 6 electronic music events in the past year 2022 Longitudinal observational study with a cross-sectional sample n = 2,415

Explore topics

By condition and practice