Patient perspectives and experiences with psilocybin treatment for treatment-resistant depression: a qualitative study
Alistair Niemeijer, Erwin Krediet, Jeanine Kamphuis, Eric Vermetten, Joost J. Breeksema, T.l. Karsten, Wim van den Brink, Robert A Schoevers
Scientific Reports February 5, 2024 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53188-9 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Qualitative study nested in a double-blind randomized clinical trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 11 |
| Population | Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) participating in a psilocybin clinical trial |
| Intervention | Psilocybin |
| Dose | 1, 10 or 25 mg |
| Duration | Single session |
| Topics | Psilocybin Depression |
| Keywords | Distrust Psychotherapist Qualitative research |
| Citations | 50 |
| Key findings | Patients with TRD emphasized the importance of trust-building, individualized preparation, multiple psilocybin sessions, and sustained psychotherapy for optimizing psilocybin treatment. |
Abstract
Abstract Psilocybin is the most researched classic psychedelic for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). While optimizing set and setting are considered essential for efficacy and safety, patient perspectives on these aspects have rarely been investigated. To address this knowledge gap, the current paper explored the experiences of 11 TRD patients (8 women, 3 men) participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial with a single session of oral (1, 10 or 25 mg) psilocybin treatment. After qualitative analysis, three major themes were identified: (1) challenges with trust-building and expectation management; (2) navigating the experience; and (3) the need for a more comprehensive treatment. Subthemes of the first theme include a general distrust in mental healthcare, trust in study therapists, limited time for preparation, and managing expectations. The second theme included the following subthemes: trusting to surrender, profound and overwhelming experiences, and music as a guide. The third theme addressed a desire for multiple psilocybin sessions, and challenges with sensemaking. Patients’ perspectives provided important insights into potential optimization of psilocybin treatment of TRD, including individualized preparation, investment in trust-building, offering additional psilocybin sessions, providing access to sustained (psycho)therapy with trusted therapists, and personalizing treatment approaches, which may also enhance real-world adaption of these treatments.
Comparable studies
Other randomized controlled trials on psilocybin for depression, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial Cancer patients with life-threatening diagnoses and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety | 2016 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 51 |
| Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial Patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression | 2016 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial | n = 29 |
| Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression Selected group of patients with depression | 2021 | Randomized controlled trial | |
| Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder Adults aged 21 to 75 years with major depressive disorder, not currently using... | 2020 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 24 |
| Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression. Adults with treatment-resistant depression | 2022 | Phase 2 double-blind randomized controlled trial | n = 233 |