Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Geoffrey Duran

2 papers in the library · publishing 2025-2026

Papers

Touching the intangible: an exploratory resting-state EEG study of complex bodily hallucinations in the general population

Neuroscience Letters July 1, 2026 Sara Salgues, Geoffrey Duran, Arnaud Fournel et al.

Experiences like sensing a presence or feeling insects crawling under the skin occur in psychiatric, neurological, and toxicological contexts but also frequently in the general population. This exploratory study examined whether resting-state electrocortical oscillatory activity is associated with proneness to such experiences. Participants completed the Complex Bodily Hallucinatory Experiences Scale (CBHES) and underwent eyes-closed resting-state EEG. Significant correlations between CBHES scores and oscillatory activity were found only in three left-lateralized clusters in the delta frequency range: the middle insula, superior anterior temporal lobe, and orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that complex bodily hallucinations involve multiple cognitive mechanisms and that intrinsic resting-state EEG activity is a candidate neurophysiological correlate of proneness to such experiences.

Complex Bodily Hallucinatory Experiences Scale (CBHES): Development, structure and psychometric properties.

L'Encephale April 4, 2025 George A Michael, Sara Salgues, Geoffrey Duran

Complex bodily hallucinations are common, with 96.6% of a general population sample of 623 participants reporting at least one. A new short scale assessing four themes—delusional parasitosis, feeling of presence, autoscopic phenomena, and body distortions—shows good internal consistency, 3-month test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The data best fit a hierarchical model linking the four themes to a higher-order factor tentatively identified as bodily self-consciousness. Combinations of themes were more frequent than isolated reports, each of which occurred in less than 5% of the sample. The scale balances specificity and sensitivity when using the 90th percentile of the total score as a classification criterion, making it suitable for clinical and research use.