Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Shu Ma

2 papers in the library · publishing 2026

Papers

Intrinsic Computational Functionalism: From Observer-Relative Maps to Observer-Independent Structures

June 4, 2026 Shu Ma, Ryota Kanai School Of Philosophy, F. University et al.

Anti-computational arguments show that externally imposed computational interpretations cannot ground consciousness, but they do not establish that all computational organisations are observer-relative. The authors develop intrinsic computational functionalism: the view that, if consciousness is computationally constituted, it depends on physically realised computational structures the system has in virtue of itself rather than on labels imposed by an external interpreter. Two criteria operationalise this view: system-intrinsic instantiation and causal-dynamical organisation under intervention. The argumentative core is a three-tier decomposition of identification work. The authors argue that syntax-is-not-semantics arguments, mapmaker arguments, and the observer-relativity component of biological-naturalist objections succeed against views that locate the consciousness-relevant property at tier (i); once the tiers are distinguished, intrinsic computational functionalism survives.

Canonical Functionalism: Defining Functional Structure without Observer-Relative Semantic Maps

arXiv.org May 9, 2026 Ryota Kanai, Shu Ma

Canonical functionalism reframes the debate about consciousness by identifying consciousness-relevant functional organization with a system's minimal state-transition structure derived from counterfactual roles, rather than arbitrary input-output mappings or semantic labels. This approach avoids observer-relative interpretations that often plague computational functionalism. The framework does not claim to identify which systems are conscious or that functional organization suffices for consciousness; instead, it specifies the canonical object over which functionalist theories should be formulated. It reframes objections about lookup tables and simulations by requiring functionalists to specify whether the relevant canonical structure is preserved.