Response to "Critique of 'A prospectively studied near-death experience with corroborated out-of-body perceptions and unexplained healing'".
Journal of Near-Death Studies 2013 P. Sartori
Abstract: In this article, I respond to a critique by Michael Rush of a 2006 article from this Journal in which I and my co-authors described a case of a near-death experience with veridical components and an inexplicable healing. I address each point from the critique in the order in which it was raised. Overall, I found most of the criticism to have been points I had already addressed in...