Risk of complications using a sedation protocol for aeromedical retrieval of acutely unwell mental health patients: a retrospective cohort study in Outback Australia.
Jack C Lewis, Angus Perks, Peter Brendt, Emma Webster, Georgina M Luscombe
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ July 16, 2025 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214719 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA protocolised approach to sedation for aeromedical transfer of acutely unwell mental health patients, including the use of ketamine, was associated with fewer complications overall and fewer severe complications compared to off-protocol care. Among 85 transfers by the Royal Flying Doctor Service in New South Wales from 2011 to 2022, complications occurred in 25.6% of on-protocol cases versus 54.3% of off-protocol cases. Severe complications were 5.1% on-protocol compared to 37.0% off-protocol. Intubated patients and those receiving midazolam, all off-protocol, had the highest rates of severe complications. No on-protocol patient required intubation or experienced treatment failure.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Retrospective cohort study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 85 |
| Population | Acutely unwell mental health patients undergoing aeromedical retrieval in New South Wales, Australia |
| Interventions | midazolam intubation |
| Topics | Ketamine |
| Keywords | Critical care transport Mental health Treatment Aeromedical retrieval Air ambulance |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | A protocolised sedation approach using ketamine was associated with fewer overall and severe complications compared to off-protocol sedation, and no on-protocol patients required intubation. |
Abstract
Aeromedical transfer of acutely unwell mental health (AMH) patients presents potential risks to patient, staff and aircraft. Pharmacological options to reduce risk can impair consciousness, risking airway compromise and management challenges in-flight. Pre-emptive intubation carries associated patient risks and requires a receiving intensive care unit bed. This study aimed to assess the risk of complications using a protocolised approach to sedation of AMH patients undergoing retrieval in New South Wales, Australia. This retrospective cohort study included all aeromedical transfers of AMH patients performed by the Royal Flying Doctor Service South Eastern Section (RFDSSE) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2022. AMH patients whose treatment during transfer aligned with the RFDSSE Mental Health (MH) transfer protocol ('On Protocol', OnP) were compared against the 'Off Protocol' (OffP) group. Patient characteristics (MH risk assessment score), transfer characteristics (duration), medications administered and complications (any, severe) experienced were compared using univariate analyses. Treatment aligned with MH transfer protocol (ie, OnP) in 45.9% (n=39) of 85 cases. Complications were more common in the OffP group (54.3% vs 25.6%, a difference of 28.7% (95% CI 7.8% to 46.2%)). Similarly severe complications occurred more frequently in the OffP group (37.0% vs 5.1%, a difference of 31.8% (95% CI 14.7% to 46.7%)). Intubated patients (n=9, all OffP) had the highest rate of severe complications at 66.7%, followed by patients who received midazolam (n=33, all OffP), with a severe complication rate of 30.3%. A protocolised approach to sedation of AMH patients undergoing aeromedical retrieval, including the use of ketamine sedation, was associated with fewer complications overall, fewer severe complications and no episodes of treatment failure or need for intubation. Our findings suggest that the use of midazolam and/or intubation in this cohort is associated with a higher risk of complications, and ketamine presents a safer alternative.