Emotion as Integrative Awareness: A Structural Theory
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) February 17, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18665843 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that emotion functions as an integrative stabilization process that reorganizes perception, affect, cognition, conation, and awareness around salient objects and representations, and proposes that this process is distinct from feeling, which is the experiential tone of emotion. The theory is formalized within the M⁵ and M¹⁰ models and generates contrastive predictions, including simultaneous cross-dimensional destabilization under emotional disruption. |
Abstract
Emotion has been variously understood as feeling, appraisal, perception of value, motivational state, or psychological construction. While each of these perspectives captures important aspects of emotional phenomena, none identifies the structural role of emotion within the architecture of conscious experience. This paper proposes a unified structural theory of emotion, arguing that emotion functions as an integrative stabilization process that reorganizes perception, affect, cognition, conation, and awareness around salient objects and representations. This thesis is derived first from convergences across multiple independent research programs—including global workspace theory, salience network neuroscience, predictive processing, and enactive cognitive science—and is then formalized within the M⁵ and M¹⁰ models of conscious systems. A critical distinction is drawn between feeling, which constitutes the experiential tone of emotion, and emotion itself, which constitutes the integrative structural process that stabilizes conscious architecture. Emotion emerges at the intersection of the intrinsic dimensions of Being and extends its influence across the dimensions of Being-in-the-World and Being-in-Reality, including moral orientation, ecological integration, artifact interaction, philosophical reflection, and transcendental awareness. The theory generates contrastive empirical predictions that distinguish it from existing accounts, including the prediction of simultaneous cross-dimensional destabilization under emotional disruption. This structural perspective provides new foundations for research in consciousness, cognition, and human development.