意识流与记忆理论同源性对标研究:基于FT-MMT体系的一项跨体系思辨互补分析
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 22, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22057161 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that folk speculative theories of consciousness and Zhao Futao's Material-Memory-Element Axiom (FT-MMT) share logical homology in three dimensions: an evolutionary tendency toward system-wide minimum consumption, the ontological independence of memory, and bidirectional entangled evolution of consciousness and memory. Proposes that the two frameworks can be hierarchically nested and mutually verifying, without judging or negating either. |
Abstract
Folk speculative theories have yielded numerous self‑consistent phenomenological conclusions regarding the operating rules of the stream of consciousness, the ontological nature of memory, and the interaction mechanism between consciousness and the subconscious. Taking the core speculative arguments from the article Stream of Consciousness, Memory, and Truth as the benchmark carrier, this paper conducts a cross‑system comparative study strictly based on Zhao Futao’s Material‑Memory‑Element Axiom (FT‑MMT), extracting only core logics with mutual homology and compatibility. It is found that profound logical homology exists between the two frameworks in three key dimensions: “the evolutionary tendency of system‑wide minimum consumption”, “the ontological independence of memory”, and “the bidirectional entangled evolution of consciousness and memory. The external theory focuses on phenomenological induction at the level of human‑brain consciousness, whereas FT‑MMT provides axiomatic tracing rooted in the ontology of universal matter. The two sets of theories can realize hierarchical nesting, mechanistic complementarity and mutual verification of perspectives. Maintaining a neutral academic stance throughout, this paper only presents homologous and compatible relationships without theoretical judgment or negation, and provides references for cross‑system integration research in the fields of consciousness and memory.