Skip to content

Quantum Measurement Reinterpreted: From Collapse to Realization via Organizational Capacity and Consciousness Potentiality

Irfan Boko

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 6, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21816991 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Proposes that measurement outcomes emerge from capacity-dependent "realization" rather than wave function collapse, with consciousness as the fundamental source of potentiality and observer capacity determining actualization. Argues this framework reconciles quantum mechanics, consciousness studies, developmental neuroscience, and sleep physiology, and offers six falsifiable experimental predictions.

Abstract

The Copenhagen interpretation's "wave function collapse" postulate has resisted unified physical explanation for over a century. This article proposes an alternative ontological framework: measurement outcomes do not result from instantaneous collapse, but from realization—the emergence of actuality from potentiality through capacity-dependent thresholds. We posit that consciousness constitutes the fundamental source of potentiality, while observer capacity (quantified via mutual information, distinguishability, or decoherence rates) determines whether potentiality actualizes into observable reality. This framework is formalized via soft-threshold sigmoid activation operators R(C,T) = 1/(1+exp(-k(C-T))), projection operators on Hilbert space, and organizational-level resonance. We address three critical objections: (1) panpsychism is avoided through organization-dependent ontological realism; (2) decoherence is reinterpreted as resonance between organizational levels rather than passive information leakage; (3) six falsifiable experimental predictions are presented, spanning double-slit variable-capacity detection, quantum erasers, Stern-Gerlach weakening, infant neural dimensionality growth, sensory threshold development, and REM sleep correlation with learning. Mathematical consistency with Born rule and Hilbert space formalism is established via normalization conditions and unitary operation proofs. The model reconciles quantum mechanics, consciousness studies, developmental neuroscience, and sleep physiology within a single ontological framework, offering testable alternatives to Copenhagen, many-worlds, pilot-wave, and objective-collapse interpretations.