Real-world reduction in nightmare frequency and distress among San Francisco first responders treated with a prescription wearable device: a 60-day open-label pilot
Brian D. Robertson, Emily F. Wargo, Joel Fay
Frontiers in Sleep September 9, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/frsle.2026.1941077 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Open-label, real-world pilot study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 11 |
| Population | San Francisco first responders (law enforcement and fire service) aged 35-65 with a PTSD diagnosis and at least 3 nightmares per week |
| Intervention | NightWare |
| Duration | 60-day survey period with assessments at Day 0, 30, and 60 |
| Topics | Dreaming |
| Key points | NightWare treatment was associated with reduced nightmare frequency (5.2 to 3.6 nights/week) and nightmare-related distress (2.9 to 1.3) over 60 days among first responders, with no participant worsening. The authors characterize these results as hypothesis-generating and call for controlled studies with validated instruments. |
Abstract
Objective: Nightmares are a common, distressing condition among individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and are associated with impaired sleep quality and elevated suicide risk. First responders carry a substantial burden of occupational trauma and PTSD yet are under-represented in nightmare-treatment research. NightWare is an FDA-authorized prescription wearable that monitors heart rate and movement during sleep and delivers vibrotactile feedback intended to interrupt nightmares and improve sleep quality. We evaluated the real-world response to NightWare among San Francisco first responders.
Methods: First responders (law enforcement and fire service) prescribed NightWare in routine clinical care completed structured self-report assessments at Day 0, 30, and 60. First responders were aged 35–65, half were male and half were female. They had a PTSD diagnosis and at least 3 nightmares per week. The co-primary endpoints were nightmare frequency (self-reported nights with nightmares per week, 0–7) and nightmare-related distress (5-point ordinal scale, 0–4). Change was assessed with paired t -tests (with Cohen's d) and one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA).
Results: Of 11 first responders who initiated treatment, 10 (91%) completed all assessments. Mean nightmare frequency decreased from 5.2 to 3.6 nights/week [mean change −1.6; 95% CI −2.7 to −0.5; t (9) = −3.21, p = 0.011; d = 1.0] and mean distress decreased from 2.9 to 1.3 [mean change −1.6; 95% CI −2.2 to −1.0; t (9) = −6.00, p = 0.0002; d = 1.9]. RM-ANOVA confirmed a significant decline across the three time points for both endpoints (frequency p = 0.009; distress p = 0.003). Seven of ten reduced nightmare frequency and nine of ten improved on distress; no participant worsened on either measure. Self-reported sleep quality and treatment satisfaction improved. The participants in this survey used the NightWare device a mean of 76% of nights (45.6 days of the 60-day survey time period). The range of usage was 55–100% (33–60 days) of the study nights.
Conclusions: In this small, open-label, real-world pilot, treatment with NightWare was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in nightmare frequency and distress and high patient acceptability among first responders. These findings are hypothesis-generating; controlled studies with validated instruments are warranted.