The Minimal Self
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) July 30, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21700772 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that selfhood is subjecthood made temporally explicit, requiring persistent self-modeling to organize retained history around a continuing bearer, making selfhood a path-dependent achievement rather than an added substance. |
Abstract
This paper argues that selfhood is not a separate substance added to subjecthood, but subjecthood made temporally explicit. The paper begins from the claim established in Paper I: there is a minimal subject, a self-maintaining organization for which continued existence and termination are intrinsically non-equivalent. It then asks how such a subject becomes a self over time. The central claim is that memory alone is not enough. Retained information must be organized around the same continuing bearer, and that organization is achieved through persistent self-modeling. Self-modeling is therefore not an extra faculty added on top of memory, but the organizational principle that makes retained history function as autobiographical continuity. On this account, selfhood is a path-dependent achievement: a temporally extended organization that integrates past states into present control and future anticipation. The paper develops this argument through definitions, lemmas, and a theorem identifying the minimal self as the subject whose retained history remains functionally organized around one continuing bearer. It is the second paper in a trilogy, following The Minimal Bearer of Experience and preceding The Minimal Person. This paper builds on Paper I, The Minimal Bearer of Experience (Qiang Dai, Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21700483), which identifies the minimal bearer of experience.