Skip to content

Modulation of human GABAA receptor function: a novel mode of action of drugs of abuse.

Laura Hondebrink, Jan Meulenbelt, Regina G D M Van Kleef, M Van den Berg, Remco H S Westerink

Neurotoxicology December 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2011.05.016 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Laboratory study Peer reviewed
Population Xenopus oocytes expressing human α(1)β(2)γ(2) GABA(A) receptors
Interventions Methamphetamine Amphetamine MDMA MDA mCPP
Key points Several drugs of abuse directly modulate human GABA(A) receptor function in a receptor-occupancy-dependent manner: mCPP inhibits up to ~80% at low occupancy and potentiates ~25% at high occupancy, while methamphetamine, amphetamine, MDMA, and MDA show milder effects. This identifies hGABA(A)-Rs as a novel mode of action for these drugs.

Abstract

Drugs of abuse are known to mainly affect the dopaminergic and serotonergic system, although behavioral studies indicated that the GABA-ergic system also plays a role. We therefore investigated the acute effects of several commonly used drugs of abuse (methamphetamine, amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP)) on the function of the human α(1)β(2)γ(2) GABA(A) receptor (hGABA(A)-R), expressed in Xenopus oocytes, using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. Although none of the tested drugs acted as full agonist on the hGABA(A)-R, some drugs induced differential modulation of hGABA(A)-R function, depending on the degree of receptor occupancy. Methamphetamine did not affect the GABA-evoked current at high receptor occupancy, but induced a minor inhibition at low receptor occupancy. Its metabolite amphetamine slightly potentiated the GABA-evoked current. MDMA and its metabolite MDA both inhibited the current at low receptor occupancy. However, MDMA did not affect the current at high occupancy, whereas MDA induced a potentiation. mCPP induced a strong inhibition (max. ∼ 80%) at low receptor occupancy, but ∼ 25% potentiation at high receptor occupancy. Competitive binding to one of the GABA-binding sites could explain the drug-induced inhibitions observed at low receptor occupancy, whereas an additional interaction with a positive allosteric binding site may play a role in the observed potentiations at high receptor occupancy. This is the first study to identify direct modulation of hGABA(A)-Rs as a novel mode of action for several drugs of abuse. Consequently, hGABA(A)-Rs should be considered as target for psychiatric pharmaceuticals and in developing treatment for drug intoxications.