Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

How brains build higher order representations of uncertainty

Megan A. K. Peters, Hojjat Azimi Asrari

Philosophy and the Mind Sciences February 27, 2026 DOI: 10.33735/phimisci.2026.12269 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Higher-order representations encode information about an agent's own first-order representations, such as their reliability or structure, and are thought to be critical for metacognition, learning, and consciousness. The authors propose that metacognitive estimates of uncertainty reflect a read-out of higher-order "posteriors" from a Bayesian perspective. These posteriors combine higher-order "likelihoods" (current uncertainty evidence) and "priors" (learned distributions over expected uncertainty). The paper discusses emerging analytical approaches to examine the estimation processes and neural correlates of these under-explored components of experienced uncertainty.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Bayesian probability Artificial neural network Noise video Encoding memory Consciousness
Citations 1
Key finding Proposes that metacognitive estimates of uncertainty reflect a read-out of higher-order Bayesian posteriors, combining higher-order likelihoods and priors.

Abstract

Higher-order representations are neural or computational states that are “about” first-order representations, encoding information not about the external world per se but about the agent’s own representational processes – such as the reliability, source, or structure of a first-order representation. These higher-order representations appear critical to metacognition, learning, and even consciousness by some accounts, yet their dimensionality, construction, and neural substrates remain poorly understood. Here, we propose that metacognitive estimates of uncertainty or noise reflect a read-out of higher-order “posteriors” from a Bayesian perspective. We then discuss how these higher-order posteriors reflect a combination of higher-order “likelihoods” (current uncertainty evidence, conditioned on true first-order uncertainty) and “priors” – learned distributions over expected first-order uncertainty – and how various emerging engineering and theory-based analytical approaches may be employed to examine the estimation processes and neural correlates associated with these highly under-explored components of our experienced uncertainty.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment