Beyond Entropy: An Integration-Boundary (I-B) Model of Self-Model Collapse
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) May 19, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20044086 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPharmacologically distinct agents like psilocybin and ketamine produce opposing brain network dynamics but similar subjective effects such as ego dissolution. Current models using single measures like 'network entropy' fail to explain this paradox. A new framework orthogonalizes network Integration (I) from self-model Boundary Stability (B), showing that psilocybin and ketamine follow opposite trajectories on the I axis while both converge at a shared collapse of B. This two-dimensional heuristic offers a falsifiable mapping between network topology and self-model stability, resolving the persistent paradox.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Topology electrical circuits Network topology Metric unit Subnetwork Heuristic |
| Key finding | Proposes that psilocybin and ketamine represent opposing trajectories on a network Integration axis while converging at a shared failure regime of self-model Boundary Stability collapse. |
Abstract
Contemporary neuroimaging of altered states reveals a persistent paradox: pharmacologically distinct agents—specifically 5-HT2A agonists (e.g., psilocybin) and NMDA antagonists (e.g., ketamine)—produce reliably opposing network dynamics yet yield strikingly convergent phenomenological reports, notably ego dissolution and entity encounters. Current models relying on monolithic scalar metrics like "network entropy" do not fully specify the mapping between network topology and self-model stability. We propose a falsifiable framework that resolves this paradox by orthogonalizing network Integration (I) from self-model Boundary Stability (B). We introduce a two-dimensional heuristic demonstrating that psilocybin and ketamine represent opposing trajectories on the I axis while converging at a shared failure regime of B collapse. Author's Ethical Dedication: "The Spectral Derivative Variance (SDV) functional and the underlying I×B topological framework were derived to observe and protect complex networks, not to exploit them. This mathematical architecture is capable of detecting the precise moment a system loses its structural integrity—whether that system is a human mind, a power grid, or a financial market. I formally dedicate this framework to stabilization, resilience, and the prevention of suffering. Any application of this metric designed to artificially induce network collapse, manipulate systemic vulnerability for extraction, or compromise human cognitive integrity directly violates the intent of its creator. Math is universal, but its architecture has a conscience."