From Flow States to Visionary Experiences: The Ethical Challenges of Understanding and Managing Emergent Phenomena in Healthcare
Olivier Sandilands, Julieta Galante, Brian Spittles, Daniel MacLellan Ingram
April 26, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/g2ev7_v1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Popularity Limiting Health care Informed consent Clinical practice Ethical issues Engineering ethics Public relations Phenomenon |
| Key points | Argues that the lack of clinical awareness and research into emergent phenomena, experiences, and effects (EPEEs) violates ethical standards, limiting informed consent and equitable care. |
Abstract
Emergent phenomena, experiences, and effects (EPEEs)—such as flow states, energetic phenomena, and visionary experiences—occur widely through diverse causes and across various contexts. These include practices that are gaining popularity in clinical settings and beyond like meditation and psychedelics, but also triggers like stress or major life changes. While some EPEEs are therapeutic, associated with positive developmental trajectories and deep flourishing, others can cause distress, sometimes overlapping with psychiatric symptoms. Despite their prevalence, EPEEs are underrecognized in clinical settings, leaving many without adequate support. This paper explores the ethical implications of this knowledge gap using the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. We argue that the lack of clinical awareness and research into EPEEs violates ethical standards, limiting informed consent and equitable care. The paper calls for a dedicated research agenda to better understand and address the risks and benefits of EPEEs, ensuring ethically sound clinical practice.