Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Commentary on Schettino et al.: What counts as psychotherapy? Empirically grounding a normative dispute in psychedelic research.

Gen Hosp Psychiatry March 10, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2026.03.007 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This commentary argues that the debate over whether psychedelic-assisted interventions qualify as psychotherapy should be grounded in empirical evidence rather than normative assumptions. The author examines the criteria typically used to define psychotherapy—such as therapeutic relationship, theoretical framework, and intentional therapeutic process—and evaluates how these apply to psychedelic sessions. The piece suggests that the classification has practical implications for research, regulation, and clinical practice. By focusing on what actually occurs during psychedelic sessions, the commentary aims to move the discussion from abstract definitions to observable features, ultimately proposing that the answer depends on the specific practices and contexts involved.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Key finding Argues that the definition of psychotherapy in psychedelic research should be empirically grounded to resolve normative disputes.

Abstract

Commentary on Schettino et al.: What counts as psychotherapy? Empirically grounding a normative dispute in psychedelic research.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment