Number needed to treat (NNT) for ketamine and esketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cameron N Calder, Angela T H Kwan, Kayla M Teopiz, Sabrina Wong, Joshua D. Rosenblat, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Taeho Greg Rhee, Roger Ho, Bing Cao, Roger S McIntyre
Journal of Affective Disorders July 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.039 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review Randomized Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 2,042 |
| Population | Adults with unipolar treatment-resistant depression |
| Interventions | Racemic ketamine Esketamine |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine Ketamine |
| Keywords | Response Treatment resistant depression Ketamine therapy Mental health treatments Antidepressant efficacy Clinical outcomes |
| Citations | 31 |
| Key findings | The number needed to treat for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression was under 10 across various time points, indicating high clinical meaningfulness. |
Abstract
Ketamine has been established as efficacious in adults living with Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD). Toward providing a quantifiable estimate of the clinical meaningfulness of the therapeutic benefit of ketamine, herein, we conduct a systematic review that aims to report the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and the Number Needed to Harm (NNH). This systematic review searched Embase, Medline/Pubmed, PsycINFO and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception up to October 15th 2023, for placebo-controlled, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) assessing racemic ketamine or esketamine therapy for unipolar TRD. We calculated NNT and NNH for ketamine treatments over various time points. A total of 21 studies with 2042 participants were included. Racemic ketamine treatments had pooled NNTs for response of 7 at 4 h, 3 from one day to one week and 9 for studies at four weeks. Esketamine treatment was found to have a similar efficacy with an NNT of 2 at one day and 11 at four weeks. NNH values indicated low risk for ketamine treatments. Limitations in the data used include the possibility of functional unblinding and selective reporting bias. Moreover, the meta-analysis may have been limited in its precision by including low threshold definitions of treatment resistance (≥ 1 failed antidepressant) and low-dose ketamine treatments. Herein, we determined that the NNT for ketamine treatment in adults living with TRD across different intervals of observation was <10. We conclude that the NNTs observed herein are highly clinically meaningful in this difficult to treat disorder.