Skip to content

Publication bias in randomized trials of psilocybin for depression: a Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Çağrı Özkurt

preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6gy8v_v1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Re-analysis of a living systematic review Randomized Open-label
Intervention Psilocybin
Topics Depression Psilocybin
Key findings After accounting for publication bias, the effect of psilocybin on depression symptoms is about 41% smaller than originally reported, with a credible interval spanning zero.

Abstract

A recent living systematic review in Nature Mental Health found psilocybin reduced depression symptoms across 12 randomized controlled trials, with pooled effect g = 0.90. The original analysis assessed publication bias using Egger’s test, non-significant — but this test has limited power with few studies and cannot produce a bias-corrected estimate. We re-analysed the same open dataset using Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis (RoBMA), which simultaneously estimates evidence for a treatment effect, heterogeneity, and publication bias. We find moderate evidence for publication bias (Bayes Factor = 3.89). After accounting for selective reporting, the bias-corrected effect (g ≈ 0.53) is ~41% smaller than published, with a credible interval spanning to zero. This evidence dissipates when open-label studies are excluded, suggesting expectancy-driven artefacts rather than file-drawer suppression. These findings do not overturn the original conclusions but indicate greater uncertainty than the frequentist analysis implies.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression 2020 Meta-analysis n = 117
Psychedelics in the treatment of unipolar mood disorders: a systematic review Patients with broadly defined unipolar mood disorders 2016 Systematic review n = 423
Psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in studies of psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms (Major... 2023 Systematic review with meta-analysis n = 14
Serotonergic hallucinogens in the treatment of anxiety and depression in patients suffering from a life-threatening disease: A systematic review. Patients with life-threatening diseases and symptoms of anxiety or depression 2018 Systematic review n = 445

Explore topics

By condition and practice