Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1)

Maggie Fedgchin, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Ella Daly, Rama Melkote, Rosanne Lane, Pilar Lim, Dawn Vitagliano, Pierre Blier, Maurizio Fava, Michael R. Liebowitz, Arun Ravindran, Raphaël Gaillard, Hans van den Ameele, Sheldon H. Preskorn, Husseini Manji, David Hough, Wayne C. Drevets, Jaskaran Singh

The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology July 9, 2019 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz039 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Double-blind Open-label Peer reviewed
Sample size 346
Population Adults with moderate-to-severe depression and nonresponse to at least two antidepressants in the current episode
Interventions Esketamine Placebo
Dose 56 or 84 mg
Duration 4-week intervention
Topics Depression Esketamine
Citations 593
Registration NCT02417064
Key findings Esketamine nasal spray added to an oral antidepressant did not significantly reduce depression scores compared to placebo plus antidepressant at 4 weeks, though the treatment effect exceeded what is considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants.

Abstract

Background: About one-third of patients with depression fail to achieve remission despite treatment with multiple antidepressants and are considered to have treatment-resistant depression.

Methods: This Phase 3, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe depression and nonresponse to ≥2 antidepressants in the current depression episode. Eligible patients (N = 346) were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-weekly nasal spray treatment (esketamine [56 or 84 mg] or placebo) plus a newly initiated, open-label, oral antidepressant taken daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, performed by blinded, remote raters. Based on the predefined statistical testing sequence, esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant had to be significant for esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant to be formally tested.

Results: Statistical significance was not achieved with esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant compared with antidepressant/placebo (least squares [LS] means difference [95% CI]: -3.2 [-6.88, 0.45]; 2-sided P value = .088). Although esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant could not be formally tested, the LS means difference was -4.1 [-7.67, -0.49] (nominal 2-sided P value = .027). The most common (>20%) adverse events reported for esketamine/antidepressant were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, and headache.

Conclusions: Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint; nevertheless, the treatment effect (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) for both esketamine/antidepressant groups exceeded what has been considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants vs placebo. Safety was similar between esketamine/antidepressant groups and no new dose-related safety concerns were identified. This study provides supportive evidence for the safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray as a new, rapid-acting antidepressant for patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02417064.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for 3 syntheses in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Esketamine 84 mg plus an oral antidepressant did not significantly reduce depression scores versus placebo plus antidepressant at 4 weeks, though the 56 mg dose showed a nominal difference.

    Synthesized

  • Esketamine 84 mg plus an oral antidepressant did not significantly reduce depression scores versus placebo plus antidepressant at 4 weeks, though the effect size exceeded the clinically meaningful threshold.

    Synthesized

  • Esketamine nasal spray added to an oral antidepressant did not significantly reduce depression scores compared to placebo plus antidepressant at 4 weeks, though the treatment effect exceeded what is considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study Adults with moderate to severe nonpsychotic depression and a history of nonresponse to... 2019 Phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter randomized controlled trial n = 227
Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults with treatment-resistant depression who achieved stable remission or stable... 2019 Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study n = 297
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults with DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of major depressive disorder and history of inadequate... 2017 Phase 2, double-blind, doubly randomized, delayed-start, placebo-controlled study n = 67
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Depressed patients at imminent risk for suicide 2018 Randomized controlled trial n = 68
Intravenous Esketamine in Adult Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Double-Blind, Double-Randomization, Placebo-Controlled Study Patients with treatment-resistant depression 2015 Randomized controlled trial n = 30

Explore topics

By condition and practice