Skip to content

International pooled patient-level meta-analysis of ketamine infusion for depression: In search of clinical moderators

Rebecca B Price, Nicholas Kissel, Andrew Baumeister, Rebecca Rohac, Mary L Woody, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Carlos A. Zarate, William Deakin, Chadi G. Abdallah, Adriana Feder, Dennis S. Charney, Michael F Grunebaum, J John Mann, Sanjay J. Mathew, Bronagh Gallagher, Declan M. Mcloughlin, James W. Murrough, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Rebecca McMillan, Rachael Sumner, George I. Papakostas, Maurizio Fava, Rebecca S. Hock, Jennifer L Phillips, Pierre Blier, Paulo R Shiroma, Peter Šóš, Tung-Ping Su, Mu-Hong Chen, Mikael Tiger, Johan Lundberg, Samuel T. Wilkinson, Meredith L Wallace

Molecular Psychiatry September 7, 2022 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01757-7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Peer reviewed
Sample size 809
Population Individuals with unipolar or bipolar depression or post-traumatic stress disorder enrolled in randomized controlled trials of intravenous ketamine
Intervention Intravenous (IV) ketamine
Duration Acute (~24 hours) and post-acute (~7 days)
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Keywords Depression treatment Ketamine therapy Mental health research Clinical trials
Citations 80
Key findings Ketamine robustly reduces depressive symptoms across a heterogeneous patient population, with larger effects relative to placebo in those with greater prior treatment resistance, but no patient-level features could guide personalized treatment decisions.

Abstract

Abstract Depression is disabling and highly prevalent. Intravenous (IV) ketamine displays rapid-onset antidepressant properties, but little is known regarding which patients are most likely to benefit, limiting personalized prescriptions. We identified randomized controlled trials of IV ketamine that recruited individuals with a relevant psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., unipolar or bipolar depression; post-traumatic stress disorder), included one or more control arms, did not provide any other study-administered treatment in conjunction with ketamine (although clinically prescribed concurrent treatments were allowable), and assessed outcome using either the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17). Individual patient-level data for at least one outcome was obtained from 17 of 25 eligible trials [pooled n = 809]. Rates of participant-level data availability across 33 moderators that were solicited from these 17 studies ranged from 10.8% to 100% (median = 55.6%). After data harmonization, moderators available in at least 40% of the dataset were tested sequentially, as well as with a data-driven, combined moderator approach. Robust main effects of ketamine on acute [~24-hours; β *(95% CI) = 0.58 (0.44, 0.72); p < 0.0001] and post-acute [~7 days; β *(95% CI) = 0.38 (0.23, 0.54); p < 0.0001] depression severity were observed. Two study-level moderators emerged as significant: ketamine effects (relative to placebo) were larger in studies that required a higher degree of previous treatment resistance to federal regulatory agency-approved antidepressant medications (≥2 failed trials) for study entry; and in studies that used a crossover design. A comprehensive data-driven search for combined moderators identified statistically significant, but modest and clinically uninformative, effects (effect size r ≤ 0.29, a small-medium effect). Ketamine robustly reduces depressive symptoms in a heterogeneous range of patients, with benefit relative to placebo even greater in patients more resistant to prior medications. In this largest effort to date to apply precision medicine approaches to ketamine treatment, no clinical or demographic patient-level features were detected that could be used to guide ketamine treatment decisions. Review Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42021235630

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta‐analysis People with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder receiving ketamine infusion 2015 Meta-analysis n = 437

Explore topics

By condition and practice