Psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder: A pilot open‐label safety and feasibility study
Elizabeth Knock, Krista J. Siefried, Gillinder Bedi, Steven M. Albert, Richard O. Day, Nadine Ezard, Margaret Ross, Paul Liknaitzky, Jonathan Brett
Addiction September 20, 2025 DOI: 10.1111/add.70187 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Single arm open label pilot study Randomized Open-label Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 15 |
| Population | Adults aged 25 or older seeking treatment for methamphetamine use, using methamphetamine at least 4 days per month, without serious mental illness or contraindicated conditions |
| Intervention | Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy |
| Dose | 25 mg oral |
| Duration | 3 preparatory sessions over 2 weeks, single dosing session, 2 integration sessions over 1 week, 90-day post-dose follow-up |
| Topics | Psilocybin Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Citations | 4 |
| Key points | Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder was feasible and safe in an outpatient setting, with reductions in methamphetamine use and craving at 28 and 90 days post-dose. |
Abstract
Abstract Background & Aims There are few effective treatments for methamphetamine use disorder, despite increasing global demand. Here, we assessed the safety and feasibility of outpatient psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder.
Design: Single arm, open label pilot study.
Setting: Outpatient public stimulant treatment program at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Participants: We recruited 15 participants that were ≥25 years old, seeking treatment for methamphetamine use, using methamphetamine ≥4 days/month at screening, and without serious mental illness or contraindicated medical conditions or medications. Intervention Participants received three preparatory psychotherapy sessions over two weeks before a single psilocybin dosing session (25 mg oral), followed by two integration psychotherapy sessions over one week. Psychotherapy included elements of motivational enhancement and acceptance and commitment therapy. Participants were followed for 90 days post psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy session.
Measurements: Primary endpoints were safety (as measured by adverse events over the trial and vital signs during psilocybin dosing) and feasibility (as measured by enrolment and dropout rates), and secondary endpoints included measuring self‐reported methamphetamine and other illicit drug use, drug craving, depression, anxiety, stress and quality of life measures.
Findings: Of 56 participants pre‐screened, 15 were eligible and enrolled, 14 completed the intervention and 13 completed 90‐day post‐dose follow‐up.”. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred, and the seven treatment related AEs were self‐limiting and mild to moderate in severity. AEs included hypertension during the dosing session and headache (n = 4), nausea (n = 1) and noise sensitivity (n = 1) within the week following the dose. Methamphetamine use (over the prior 28 days) was observed to be higher at screening (median 12 days, IQR 7–16, n = 15) relative to day 28 (median 0 days, IQR 0–2, n = 13) and 90 (median 2 days, IQR 1–4, n = 14) post psilocybin. [Correction added on 20 November 2025, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, ‘lower’ has been changed to 'higher' in this version.] Methamphetamine craving was also observed to be lower while quality of life, depression, anxiety, and stress were observed to be higher at days 28 and 90 follow‐up relative to baseline.
Conclusions: Psilocybin assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder was feasible to implement in an outpatient setting and did not appear to generate safety concerns. A larger randomised controlled trial is required to confirm efficacy and safety.