The factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ): Reply to Bouso et al., 2016.
Frederick S. Barrett, Roland R. Griffiths
Hum Psychopharmacol January 1, 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hup.2564 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) is defended against critiques by Bouso et al. (2016). The authors argue that the MEQ's multi-factor model, which captures dimensions such as ineffability and mystical encounter, remains a reliable and valid tool for measuring spiritual experiences. They contend that the proposed alternative structure does not better represent the underlying facets of mystical phenomena and that the original model demonstrates consistent psychometric properties across studies. The reply emphasizes the questionnaire's effectiveness in assessing deep spiritual phenomena and maintains that its current structure is supported by empirical evidence.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Reply or commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mystical experience |
| Keywords | Deep spiritual phenomena Mystical encounters Ineffable experiences Psychometrics Reliable measurement |
| Citations | 12 |
Abstract
The factor structure of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ): Reply to Bouso et al., 2016.